- From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:29:50 +0100
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
I'm reviewing http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ClassesAsValues-20040623/ This gets a thumbs up to publish from me. There are some policy issues for the tc/wg to consider and some minor changes I'd recommend before publication. I'd be happy to leave the latter to the editor's discretion. Brian Policy Issues ============= - referring to real services e.g. http://isbn.nu/ and real books http://isbn.nu/0736809643 - including references to specific tools e.g. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ClassesAsValues-20040623/books1. owl ends with [[ <!-- Created with Protege (with OWL Plugin 1.1 beta, Build 126) http://protege.stanford.edu -->]] Also the xmlbase and default namespaces are defined in http://protege... Including Owl abstract syntax. Do we want to encourage proliferation of another syntax? Maybe its already in widespread use amongst ontologists. Preferred changes before publication: ===================================== Update open issues to remove concerns about dc:subject Update open issues with wording specifically requesting feedback on preferred option, e.g. [[ Several DL compatible approaches are suggested in this document. The WG seeks to determine whether there is consensus on a preferred approach that is DL compatible. The WG therefore seeks input and feedback from the community on this question. ]] Update open issues to remove reference to "are approaches 2 and 4 the same". I now think they are clearly different. Quick fixes =========== Typo, Abstract: ... Any restriction on using clashes as values ... ^^^^^^^ Typo, Considerations when choosing Approch 4 ... The subject of the book is a one or more ... ^^^ Other Comments ============== Dc:subject is hyperlinked to an RDFS document when the reader might expect it to link to a human readable description of dc:subject. My mozilla browser prints the figure in approach 2 twice, once distorted. It appears ok when read on the screen. And also in approach 5. In both cases the first occurrence of the figure is at the bottom of a page. Mozilla bug, I suspect.
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2004 13:37:04 UTC