- From: Thomas Baker <thomas.baker@bi.fhg.de>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 15:58:56 +0200
- To: Natasha Noy <noy@smi.stanford.edu>
- Cc: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
> 4.5 OEP > > discussion centred around allocating reviewers for drafts for > publication, and known outstanding issues. > > [OEP] Classes as values > > Outstanding issue: use dc:subject or not? > Natasha has circulated two drafts, one which uses dc:subject and one > which doesn't. > > ACTION: tom quck read of ClassesAsValues for dc:subject issue From a DCMI point of view, I personally see no reason not to use dc:subject in the example. (In other words: okay with me.) Tom -- Dr. Thomas Baker Thomas.Baker@izb.fraunhofer.de Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352 Personal email: thbaker79@alumni.amherst.edu
Received on Saturday, 3 July 2004 09:57:22 UTC