* Bernard Vatant | | For the record, the idea to add a note about TM to the n-ary | document arose before the TM Task Force was formed. | | I agree with Lars and Fabien. I'm glad to hear that. However, I think we now lost the point I *was* making. The n-ary document is presumably going to make recommendations about how to express n-ary relationships in RDF, and the RDFTM documents should note this and 1) explain how an RDF->TM converter can detect such relationships and correctly convert them to n-ary topic map associations, and 2) explain how a TM->RDF converter can represent n-ary topic map association in RDF. It now seems like this is mostly something for the RDFTM TF to think about, but possibly with some consequences for the n-ary relations draft. -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > GSM: +47 98 21 55 50 <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no >Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2004 11:37:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 27 January 2023 01:58:22 UTC