- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:25:37 +0000
- To: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
I've just completed and uploaded a first pass on the whole of the value section. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw/#sec-values Still to do in that section: - sort out references - summary table of examples versus approaches - check XPath 2.0 eq details for dates and time - update table of contents - my own review and second pass I hope to get some of those done tomorrow morning. I have finessed the 'what does xpath eq mean problem' with the following text: [[ Using eq as the basis for typed literal value semantics in RDF and OWL would, from an implementation point of view, amount to using eq at all points where a comparison between two literals is needed. Since there are many different approaches to implementing RDF and OWL semantics such a procedural definition is somewhat unsatisfactory. If this approach is pursused the next version of this document will characterize the resulting implementation variability. ]] I've included some further musings along the 'characterize the resulting implementation variability.' dimensions but perhaps those musings should go, since they are not properly thought out. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2004 17:25:57 UTC