W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > December 2004

[XSCH] value stuff finished (sort of)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:25:37 +0000
Message-ID: <41ADFE91.3030608@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

I've just completed and uploaded a first pass on the whole of the value 


Still to do in that section:
- sort out references
- summary table of examples versus approaches
- check XPath 2.0 eq details for dates and time
- update table of contents
- my own review and second pass

I hope to get some of those done tomorrow morning.

I have finessed the 'what does xpath eq mean problem' with the following 

Using eq as the basis for typed literal value semantics in RDF and OWL 
would, from an implementation point of view, amount to using eq at all 
points where a comparison between two literals is needed. Since there 
are many different approaches to implementing RDF and OWL semantics such 
a procedural definition is somewhat unsatisfactory. If this approach is 
pursused the next version of this document will characterize the 
resulting implementation variability.

I've included some further musings along the 'characterize the resulting 
implementation variability.' dimensions but perhaps those musings should 
go, since they are not properly thought out.

Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2004 17:25:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:03 UTC