public-swbp-wg@w3.org from April 2004 by date

Friday, 30 April 2004

• Re: Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp Pat Hayes
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbp Uschold, Michael F
• [WNET] Fwd: Re: W3C Task Force on Porting Wordnet to the Semantic Web Aldo Gangemi
• RE: [ALL] Requirements for updating OWL -- was FAQ : Constraints on data values range Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Alan Rector
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft Bernard Vatant
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft Uschold, Michael F
• [PORT] policy on URI structure for thesaurus concepts Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• RE: Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• [PORT] SKOS migration guidelines Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft Bernard Vatant
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web Jos De_Roo
• Re: Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp Aldo Gangemi
• RE: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web Uschold, Michael F

Thursday, 29 April 2004

• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft Jos De_Roo
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Jos De_Roo
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Classes as values $swbp Uschold, Michael F
• Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Bernard Vatant
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• [ALL] F2F meeting at ESWS / OntoWeb / KnowledgeWeb in Crete Fabien Gandon
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd Deborah L. McGuinness
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Gary Ng
• [PORT] method note Guus Schreiber
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft Dan Brickley
• Re: Classes as values Fabien Gandon
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Jos De_Roo
• Announcement of SWAD-Europe SKOS API for thesauri web service Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• [ADTF] possible illustration of apps and demos direction Libby Miller
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon David Norheim
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon McBride, Brian
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Guus Schreiber

Wednesday, 28 April 2004

• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Classes as values Alan Rector
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Jeremy Carroll
• [ALL] Introduction Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• RE: ECOTERM - RE: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview Miles, AJ (Alistair)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• [Fwd: [OEP,ALL] Potential FAQ: annotation schema problem J.R. van Ossenbruggen
• [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Short Introduction Benjamin Nguyen
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd Uschold, Michael F

Tuesday, 27 April 2004

• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft Aldo Gangemi
• Re: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd Natasha Noy
• [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft Natasha Noy
• Re: [ALL, XSCH] Proposal for telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: [OEP] Summary please Guus Schreiber
• RE: [XSCH] draft comment on XML Schema WG draft charter Jeremy Carroll
• [OEP] Summary please Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 26 April 2004

• FW: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd Uschold, Michael F

Saturday, 24 April 2004

• Re: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd Natasha Noy
• Re: [OEP] using rdfs:isDefinedBy [was "Classes as values" first draft] Natasha Noy
• RE: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics Natasha Noy
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Natasha Noy

Friday, 23 April 2004

• ECOTERM - RE: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview Bernard Vatant
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Alan Rector

Thursday, 22 April 2004

• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics Aldo Gangemi
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Alan Rector
• timing for april 29 telecon Deborah L. McGuinness

Wednesday, 21 April 2004

• [OEP] Suggestions for other patterns Natasha Noy
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical Jim Hendler
• [ALL, XSCH] Proposal for telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical Alan Rector
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web Jim Hendler
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical Jim Hendler
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) $swbpd Jim Hendler
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Natasha Noy
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Natasha Noy

Tuesday, 20 April 2004

• Re: [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Fabien Gandon
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraintson datavalues range] $swbpd Uschold, Michael F

Monday, 19 April 2004

• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Alan Rector
• [OPEN] and/or [PORT]: Role of Classification Alan Rector
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Alan Rector
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Natasha Noy
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Natasha Noy
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Natasha Noy
• [XSCH] draft comment on XML Schema WG draft charter Jeremy Carroll
• [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Jeremy Carroll
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) $swbpd Uschold, Michael F

Sunday, 18 April 2004

• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd Jos De_Roo
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd Jim Hendler

Saturday, 17 April 2004

• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd Frank van Harmelen
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd Jos De_Roo
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd Jos De_Roo
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions areinadequate(was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd Uschold, Michael F

Friday, 16 April 2004

• Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Jos De_Roo
• Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Pat Hayes
• tips on getting blog projects to include more triples? Seth Ladd

Thursday, 15 April 2004

• RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Pat Hayes
• meeting record: 2004-04-15 SemWeb BPD WG telecon Ben Booth
• Re: [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions are inadequate (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Pat Hayes
• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Pat Hayes
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Pat Hayes
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon Pat Hayes
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• [ALL] F2F at ESWS in Heraklion Fabien Gandon
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• [All, OEP, WRLD] F2F at WWW in NYC $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Aditya A Kalyanpur
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Aditya A Kalyanpur
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Jim Hendler
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• regrets for BP telecon / electronic dictionaries Dan Brickley
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Jim Hendler
• Re: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Fabien Gandon
• telecon regrets Aditya A Kalyanpur
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon Ralph R. Swick
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• regrets for telecon Jennifer Golbeck
• RE: Whether property values should be namespace prefixed Mark Birbeck
• Regrets David Norheim
• Re: OEP and Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon Natasha Noy
• Introduction Ben Booth
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] Uschold, Michael F

Wednesday, 14 April 2004

• OEP and Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: partial regrets for 15-April Ben Adida
• Re: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] Guus Schreiber
• partial regrets for 15-April Ralph R. Swick
• Re: [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling languages $swbpd ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling languages $swbpd Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] or [UNITS] : How to explicitly define a Metaclass Oscar Corcho
• [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon Guus Schreiber
• [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft Natasha Noy
• Re: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview Guus Schreiber
• [OEP] or [UNITS] : How to explicitly define a Metaclass NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• Regrets for 2004-04-15 telecon Nick Gibbins
• [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] Guus Schreiber
• Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Guus Schreiber
• Regrets Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 13 April 2004

• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range benoit.doumas@free.fr

Saturday, 10 April 2004

• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Uschold, Michael F

Friday, 9 April 2004

• Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Natasha Noy
• [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range Bernard Vatant
• [ALL] straw poll open for SWBPD telecon times Ralph R. Swick

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• RE: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview Bernard Vatant

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 6 April 2004

• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Uschold, Michael F
• meeting record: 2004-04-01 SemWeb BPD WG telecon Ralph R. Swick
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Oscar Corcho
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Sean Bechhofer
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jeremy Carroll
• Killer App: IRS Danny Ayers
• RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Uschold, Michael F

Monday, 5 April 2004

• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Frank van Harmelen
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jim Hendler
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Frank van Harmelen
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jim Hendler
• RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Jim Hendler
• RE: [ALL] WordNet Task Force - work outline Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF Thomas Baker
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF Jim Hendler
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF Thomas Baker
• RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF McBride, Brian
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF Libby Miller
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF David Norheim
• Distribution of Species Use Jennifer Golbeck

Sunday, 4 April 2004

• Re: [ALL] More TF topics...? Guus Schreiber

Friday, 2 April 2004

• RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF McBride, Brian
• Would these be examples of questions for some best practices FAQ? Fabien Gandon
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jeremy Carroll
• [ALL] More TF topics...? Thomas Baker
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Fabien Gandon
• [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• RE: Q on scope of ADTF NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• Q on scope of ADTF Aditya A Kalyanpur
• [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview Dan Brickley
• Introduction Fabien Gandon
• Introduction: Tom Baker Thomas Baker
• Re: WordNet TF: short note on porting issues Aldo Gangemi
• Re: ALL: agenda April 1 telecon Aldo Gangemi
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• WordNet TF: short note on porting issues Guus Schreiber
• RE: agenda April 1 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Guus Schreiber
• RE: agenda April 1 telecon Bernard Vatant
• Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev Nick Gibbins
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Libby Miller
• Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev Nick Gibbins
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Bernard Vatant
• A simple exercise (was RE : philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• Summary of On a possible role for the applications and demos tas k force McBride, Brian
• RE: agenda April 1 telecon McBride, Brian
• telecon scheduling Deborah L. McGuinness

Last message date: Friday, 30 April 2004 19:25:14 UTC