- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:59:42 -0500
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 05:09:57PM +0100, Williams, Stuart wrote: > Yes indeed... there appeared to be an implicit expectation of what > processing should take place (which afaict is one of the topics on this > thread). I'll fix that, thanks. > > Well, if the result of the transformation has no associated > > media type, then either a) whatever receives those results is > > adding a media type which is different than the original one, > > b) namespace dispatch is being activated as a result of the > > transform taking place, or > > c) some other funkiness. > > wrt a) whatever receives those results is processing them in an application > specific manner. It may not be 'inventing' media-type - I mean... how could > you tell? We'd need a new test to permit us to distinguish between the dispatch types. > It's an internal matter for the recipient of the original > representation inc. media-type. > > wrt b) how can you tell that any namespace dispatch is occuring... results > for test 4 rather suggest that the root namespace of the result is ignored. You can't tell it's happening, but you can't tell it's not either. Hence the alternative explanations. 8-) Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 12:53:50 UTC