- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:07:01 -0000
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
Hello Mark, > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Baker [mailto:mbaker@markbaker.ca] On Behalf Of Mark Baker > Sent: 26 March 2004 04:04 <snip/> > > > I believe it's because - as I > > > said above - that the recipient would believe that the sender is > > > trying to communicate the graph. > > > > I guess that your are free to believe (1st believe above) that... but > > I don't think it would be a universally shared belief (2nd believe above). > > Sure. > > FWIW, my mental model which drives this belief is of two > agents on either side of an HTTP connection that want to > communicate. As an HTTP message is the only means they have > for communication, it's important that the meaning of the > communication, as determined by the sender, be pickled up > into a message such that when it's received by the other > agent, it can be unpickled and that original meaning > reconstructed in its entirety. I'd feel on shaky ground going anywhere near that (some sense of complete reconstruction of speaker's meaning). > Mark. > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Stuart --
Received on Friday, 26 March 2004 04:08:06 UTC