- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:43:23 -0500
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:34:19PM -0000, Williams, Stuart wrote: > > Extracting the graph isn't the bad part. What's bad is > > believing that the recipient was trying to communicate the graph. > ^^^^^^^^sender? Doh! Must be the head cold. 8-( > What (I think) would be bad would be assuming/believing that the sender > meant to send with media-type application/rdf+xml. True, but why is that bad? I believe it's because - as I said above - that the recipient would believe that the sender is trying to communicate the graph. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2004 13:36:06 UTC