RE: No Standard Semantic Web Pragmatics?

>
>                                 Cheers,  -- Adrian
>
>Pat -  Could you post a pointer to your paper about performatives please?

It was the paper already cited by John:

http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/SWTSGuide/carroll-ISWC2004.pdf

particularly section 5.2. The only place where this has any formal 
'bite' is in section 6.2, (top of page 13) which contains what 
amounts to a 'semantic web pragmatics proposal' to treat certain 
kinds of RDF graphs as being 'warrants', which are defined in the 
paper to be a certain kind of social action by an agent.  Like any 
other social convention, this will actually work only to the extent 
that people agree, implicitly or explicitly, to respect it  and act 
accordingly: but the proposal is at least on the table, so to speak.

>
>Peter - Apologies if this is "formatted".  Eudora sometimes makes 
>the format decision independently.

I have had other complaints about Eudora formatting, which gives some 
old and cranky UNIX mailhandlers some trouble.  For a possible 
explanation see

http://www.eudora.com/techsupport/kb/1625hq.html

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 18:50:42 UTC