- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:50:13 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, JohnBlack@deltek.com, public-sw-meaning@w3.org
* Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> [2004-06-11 08:29-0400] > > > >From Peter F. Patel-Schneider: > > In any case, there are indeed already more-or-less standard ways of doing > > much of what you appear to want. > > I'm inclined to agree. Likewise. In practice, the way I have been doing this is just to treat RDF/XML documents much the way I treat XHTML XML documents, or other text files. They are things with properties such as creator, creation date, checksum etc. And as textual documents, they can be digitally signed, encrypted etc. with widely available tools such as PGP. When I write an RDF file that is important enough that I want others to know that (a) I wrote it, (b) it hasn't been subsequently changed, I just include markup in the document that mentions me as the author, and points to the results of PGP signing it. Coming up with a formal account of all this would be hard work, but the basic approach of treating RDF documents as having common characteristics with other document formats seems a plausible and pragmatic way of making progress. cheers, Dan
Received on Friday, 11 June 2004 08:50:14 UTC