- From: karl <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:53:58 -0400
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 19:26:03 UTC
Le Vendredi, 26 sept 2003, à 15:53 America/Montreal, Tim Berners-Lee a écrit : > ((Crude example: An ontology defining ex:Elephant defines it in terms > of some well > known ontology wko by saying: > > ex:Elephant rdfs:isSubClassOf wko:Mammal . > wko:Animal rdfs:isSubClassOf ex:InterestingThings . > > What is relevant to the definition of ex:Elephant? Hmm not sure. But the japanese author, Murakami Haruki, has said that "The Elephant vanishes". If an elephant could vanish, one could necessary lost the meaning of all of that. :) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 19:26:03 UTC