- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:49:05 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
[ Peter proposes a straw man (which he later tears down): ] > One way of providing intended meanings for URI references in the > Semantic Web would be to require that part of the formal meaning of a > URI reference be the constraints embodied in the document that is > accessable by looking up the URI reference (without any fragment) in > the World Wide Web. I called this idea "UseImpliesConsent", as in: UseImpliesConsent is the general notion that the decision to use a particular URI when authoring an RDF graph is based in part on the web behavior (such as content served) at that URI and so such use of the URI constitutes a kind of consent or approval of that behavior. -- http://esw.w3.org/topic/UseImpliesConsent but, like you, I don't actually think it works. I explored the more general notion here on http://esw.w3.org/topic/FollowLinksForMoreInformation
Received on Friday, 19 September 2003 16:49:14 UTC