- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:49:05 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
[ Peter proposes a straw man (which he later tears down): ]
> One way of providing intended meanings for URI references in the
> Semantic Web would be to require that part of the formal meaning of a
> URI reference be the constraints embodied in the document that is
> accessable by looking up the URI reference (without any fragment) in
> the World Wide Web.
I called this idea "UseImpliesConsent", as in:
UseImpliesConsent is the general notion that the decision to
use a particular URI when authoring an RDF graph is based in
part on the web behavior (such as content served) at that URI
and so such use of the URI constitutes a kind of consent or
approval of that behavior.
-- http://esw.w3.org/topic/UseImpliesConsent
but, like you, I don't actually think it works.
I explored the more general notion here on
http://esw.w3.org/topic/FollowLinksForMoreInformation
Received on Friday, 19 September 2003 16:49:14 UTC