public-sw-meaning@w3.org from October 2003 by date

Friday, 31 October 2003

• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon Bijan Parsia
• RE: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon John Black

Thursday, 30 October 2003

• [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon Sandro Hawke
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Bijan Parsia
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use pat hayes

Wednesday, 29 October 2003

• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Sandro Hawke
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Sandro Hawke
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Lynn, James (Software Services)
• The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 18 October 2003

• RE: Using two URIs for the same thing Williams, Stuart
• Re: Using two URIs for the same thing Dan Connolly

Friday, 17 October 2003

• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) Dan Connolly
• RE: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) Lynn, James (Software Services)
• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) karl

Thursday, 16 October 2003

• Re: Terms and statements Thomas B. Passin
• RE: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) pat hayes
• Re: [Fwd: consensus and ownership] pat hayes
• RE: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) Lynn, James (Software Services)
• Using two URIs for the same thing Sandro Hawke
• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) Bijan Parsia
• Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) Graham Klyne
• Re: [Fwd: consensus and ownership] Thomas B. Passin

Wednesday, 15 October 2003

• Re: [Fwd: consensus and ownership] Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 14 October 2003

• [Fwd: consensus and ownership] Dan Connolly
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant karl
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? karl
• RE: in defense of standards Lynn, James (Software Services)

Saturday, 11 October 2003

• Re: Relevant bits of the TAG doc? Dan Connolly
• Re: otiose vs odious Graham Klyne

Friday, 10 October 2003

• Relevant bits of the TAG doc? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment Bijan Parsia
• Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment Dan Connolly
• Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment Bijan Parsia
• Re: in defense of standards Dan Connolly
• Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment Dan Connolly
• Re: consensus and consistency pat hayes
• Re: otiose vs odious Bijan Parsia
• otiose vs odious Sandro Hawke
• consensus and consistency Dan Connolly
• Re: in defense of standards Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon Dan Brickley
• Re: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon Sandro Hawke
• Re: in defense of standards Sandro Hawke
• Re: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon Graham Klyne
• Re: in defense of standards Sandro Hawke
• Against Strong Ontological Commitment Bijan Parsia
• Re: in defense of standards Bijan Parsia
• RE: in defense of standards John Black
• Some talking points for today Bijan Parsia
• Re: in defense of standards Graham Klyne
• Re: in defense of standards Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Jim Hendler
• Re: in defense of standards Bijan Parsia
• in defense of standards Sandro Hawke
• Fwd: Freedom lovin' formalists Bijan Parsia
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Bijan Parsia
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant pat hayes
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 9 October 2003

• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant pat hayes
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant pat hayes
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant pat hayes
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Sandro Hawke
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Sandro Hawke
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Dan Connolly
• [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon Sandro Hawke
• book on argument and inference, Gabbay et al. Jim Farrugia
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Bijan Parsia
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant pat hayes
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? Bijan Parsia
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? John Black
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Graham Klyne
• Re: FYI: timbl and bijan chatting about running code, closure, etc. Graham Klyne
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 8 October 2003

• Re: FYI: timbl and bijan chatting about running code, closure, etc. Jim Hendler
• Re: Provenance/Justification Jim Hendler
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" Jim Hendler
• Re: Provenance/Justification pat hayes
• FYI: timbl and bijan chatting about running code, closure, etc. Dan Connolly
• what matters is what's said, not what's meant Sandro Hawke
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" pat hayes
• Provenance/Justification Sandro Hawke
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" Sandro Hawke
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" pat hayes
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" pat hayes
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" Sandro Hawke
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" Jim Hendler
• A bit of running code for "Tim's View" Sandro Hawke

Monday, 6 October 2003

• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? Graham Klyne
• Re: Tim v. Bijan use case (was Re: Proposed issue:...) pat hayes
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? pat hayes

Sunday, 5 October 2003

• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? Graham Klyne

Saturday, 4 October 2003

• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? pat hayes

Friday, 3 October 2003

• Re: Tim v. Bijan use case (was Re: Proposed issue:...) Dan Connolly
• Tim v. Bijan use case (was Re: Proposed issue:...) Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? John Black
• Re: Thought experiments on a proposed solution Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? pat hayes
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)
• RE: Thought experiments on a proposed solution John Black
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? Bijan Parsia

Thursday, 2 October 2003

• RE: Thought experiments on a proposed solution pat hayes
• What is the issue Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• RE: Thought experiments on a proposed solution John Black
• Re: Thought experiments on a proposed solution pat hayes
• Thought experiments on a proposed solution John Black

Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2003 13:00:07 UTC