- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:24:19 -0800
- To: "'Sandro Hawke'" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
Thanks; it seems that you have analyzed the issues in significant depth, and I think I agree with your analysis of the issues and your earlier desire for a resolution. I'd be happy to eliminate my (c) and have either Hyperlink or TDB semantics in RDF, but I'm not sure how to use an RDF (or a semantic web) which isn't clear about what it means, or one in which it isn't possible to make useful assertions about web pages themselves. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net > I once proposed they make this split real [1], but RDF Core declined. > (More formally, as I recall, they simply didn't chose to decide > anything about it, in the days right before Last Call #1, and I never > raised it as a Last Call issue.) Also, when I tried to implement it, > I found it rather painful, so since then I've focussed on how to live > with one shared context; I've found it surprisingly possible. Some > notes near [2]. > > -- sandro > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/12/rdf-identifiers/ > [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/DualUseUri >
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 18:24:56 UTC