- From: Roel Nieskens <roel@pixelambacht.nl>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:10:32 +0200
- To: jfkthame@gmail.com
- Cc: public-svgopentype@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2018 07:11:09 UTC
I created an OpenType SVG test font that has one glyph using CSS animations, and one SMIL animations. Edge on Windows 10 supports CSS animations, but not SMIL. Firefox on Windows 10 and OS X supports SMIL, but not CSS animations. Other browsers either don't support any OpenType SVG animation, or OpenType SVG as a whole. You can see the font in action here: https://pixelambacht.nl/lapislegit/ Personally, as much as I'd like this format to do Everything™, I think it's saner and resulting in more stable implementation if animation was dropped. Best regards, -Roel Nieskens On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:45 PM Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com> wrote: > Among the various implementations of SVG-in-OpenType, how widely > supported is animation of the SVG glyphs? > > Is this a feature that people consider valuable, or should we consider > dropping it in the interests of simplification and greater uniformity > across implementations? > > Jonathan > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2018 07:11:09 UTC