- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:41:14 -0700
- To: Sairus Patel <sppatel@adobe.com>
- Cc: "public-svgopentype@w3.org" <public-svgopentype@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 02:41:59 UTC
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Sairus Patel <sppatel@adobe.com> wrote: > Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > > Please also file bug against firefox, if it is respecting transform on > svg for SVG 1.2. > > I don’t think I’ll do that: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2016Apr/0011.html: > > Robert Longson wrote: > If you raised a bug about version="1.1" and transform on the <svg> element > I'd close it as INVALID or WONTFIX. > Firefox will not read the version attribute and do different things > depending on its value. > Best regards > Robert. > > Meh. So, what is the stance of this working group on the required version of SVG in SVG+OpenType, and what's the future compatibility plan?
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 02:41:59 UTC