Re: Unified draft of SVG-in-OT

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Nikos Andronikos <
nikos.andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au> wrote:

> I do have one question.
> The proposal notes that the font bounding box in the head table must be
> suitable for static renderings of the glyph.
> How is this possible considering features of the glyph may be set
> through parameters?
> e.g. the user may specify a stroke width of any size.
>

I think the spec probably shouldn't say that. The bounding boxes in the
head table should probably just be ignored for SVG glyphs. The renderer can
compute the bounding boxes from the SVG content.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*

Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 00:31:11 UTC