svg2: added IDL reference back

details:   https://svgwg.org/hg/svg2/rev/2f812635b8e7
branches:  
changeset: 582:2f812635b8e7
user:      Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
date:      Mon Jan 27 12:52:45 2014 -0600
description:
added IDL reference back

diffstat:

 master/interact.html |  3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diffs (23 lines):

diff --git a/master/interact.html b/master/interact.html
--- a/master/interact.html
+++ b/master/interact.html
@@ -1257,16 +1257,19 @@ element.
   has an <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/dom.html#activation-behavior">activation behavior</a> that does nothing.</p>
 
   <p class="note">This means that an element that is only focusable
   because of its <code><a href="#SVGElementTabindexAttribute">tabindex</a></code> attribute
   will fire a <code><a href="#ClickEvent">click</a></code> event in response
   to a non-mouse activation (e.g. hitting the "enter" key while the
   element is focused).</p>
 
+  <p>The <dfn id="dom-tabindex" title="dom-tabIndex"><code>tabIndex</code></dfn> IDL
+  attribute must <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/infrastructure.html#reflect">reflect</a> the value of the <code><a href="#SVGElementTabindexAttribute">tabindex</a></code> content attribute.</p>
+
   </div>
   <div class="impl">
 
   <h4 id="focus-management">Focus management</h4>
   
 <p class="issue">Need to decide how will replace some of the links pertainig to "in a document",  "Document", and "being rendered". This is dependent on Document work that needs to be added wrt. tabindex. Do we define our own definitions vs. what is in HTML5?</p>
 
   <p>An element is <dfn id="focusable">focusable</dfn> if the user agent's default

Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 18:55:06 UTC