RE: CfC: publishing LCWD of Compositing and Blending; deadline 26 December 2013

Did we not resolve to clean up the plethora of group mailing lists and reducing it just to one for main group discussion?

Thomas 


-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schepers@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 12:35
To: Cameron McCormack
Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: CfC: publishing LCWD of Compositing and Blending; deadline 26 December 2013

Hi, Cameron–

Can I request that this email, like those that ArtB sends, be sent to the *real* public list, www-svg, instead of public-svg-wg?

Regards-
-Doug

On 12/19/13 1:21 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Hello SVG WG,
>
> I'd like to try an experiment.  Rik mentioned in 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2013Dec/0076.html that 
> he'd like to request another LCWD publication of Compositing and 
> Blending, before we get to the CR that we agreed to recently, due to 
> some changes that had to be made.  Please see his mail there for 
> details of what has changed in the spec.
>
> Since I already cancelled the call before his mail was brought to my 
> attention, I want to try getting consensus on the LCWD publication via 
> email.  To that end (and copying Art Barstow's template):
>
>
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a LCWD of Compositing 
> and Blending, using the following ED as the basis:
>
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/raw-file/cfd29e719046/compositing-1/index.

> html
>
> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's 
> decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process 
> Document states the following regarding the significance/meaning of a LCWD:
>
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call

>
> Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant 
> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) 
> in the Working Draft;
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant 
> dependencies with other groups;
>
> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these 
> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement 
> is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the 
> technical report to later maturity levels.
> ]]
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them 
> to public-svg-wg@w3.org by December 26 at the latest. Positive 
> response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as 
> agreement with the proposal.
>
> The proposed review period for this LC is 4 weeks.
>
> Assuming this CfC passes, if there are any specific groups (e.g. 
> HTMLWG, TAG, I18N, WAI, Privacy IG, Security IG, etc.) or external 
> SDOs we should ask to review the LCWD, please let us know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cameron
>

Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 21:21:40 UTC