- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:44:22 +0200
- To: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hello folks, At the August meeting at the TypeCon conference, several people seemed to be of the opinion that the SVG Glyphs in OpenType spec was immature, not finished, that there were two competing specifications, and so on. We corrected that impression but needed to indicate stability. So for ATypI in October, the spec was published as a final specification (there are only two states for a CG, draft and final) which also triggers a round of patent commitments (most members of the CG have now made the commitment and I am told that Adobe is working on it). This marks the spec as ready for standardisation (CGs dont make standards); typically this means chartering a Working group but in this case it means handoff to ISO SC29 where Open Type is standardised. At the meeting the Google proposal (static PNG images), the Microsoft one (multiple solid-colour truetype shapes, with hinting) and the SVG Glyphs for OpenType proposal (multicolor, gradient, filter, animations) were all presented and explained y their proponents (Apple was not present to explain theirs, which is also not published but has been reverse engineered). I introduced the SVG proposal and explained what it could do (and what it would not do, like include HTML or Flash or script) and gave background and responded to several questions. Sairus showed a tablet rendering a shaded, 3D-look incised version of Adobe Trajan. Jonathan showed an old Android phone and a new Firefox OS phone both running Firefox with coloured emoji and an animated font (using SVG, smil-style animation). It seems there is interest in each of the three proposals for different use cases and it seems likely that more than one (perhaps all three) will be standardized. In that connection, work to create the shared palette table (SVG and Microsoft approaches both use this table) was a positive sign. ISO SC29 will be meeting in January to discuss the proposals. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 15:44:27 UTC