- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:02:39 +1000
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
I would be surprised however if it were safe to make HTML elements live in no namespace rather than the HTML namespace. (Otherwise I'm sure Ian would have done so.) Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > Yeah, they don't like namespaces. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 8, 2013, at 2:36 AM, "Dirk Schulze" <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 8, 2013, at 6:03 AM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > > > > > Rik Cabanier wrote: > > >> Very nice! > > >> > > >> At the same time, also very revolutionary. > > >> Do you think there will be objections from the HTML WGs since > you're reusing some of their elements and introducing a new one? > > > > > > Yes, if we went ahead with this unilaterally. :-) If we wanted to move > > > ahead with a proposal like this we'd need to work in conjunction with > > > HTML folks. > > > > > > > Does point 6 require authors to use document.createElementNS on SVG > elements? I think it would be great if we can "auto detect" the > namespace. Obviously we have the problem with overlapping elements > between HTML and SVG. I think the HTML editors vote for removing namespaces. > > > > Greetings, > > Dirk > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 12:03:28 UTC