- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:25:23 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Aug 1, 2012, at 13:42 , Cameron McCormack wrote: > Another change is that the scripts no longer use the svg.idl file, and in fact no special parsing/processing of IDL interfaces is done. The markup is a bit messy still, but the DOM Interfaces sections in each chapter is just a <pre class="idl"> for the interface and the <dl>s below that for the description of the interface members. IMO this layout within the chapter doesn't work so well so at some point we might want to move the IDL fragments up near the element definitions and do something else with the operation/attribute definitions. But for now they are in their current place with the same look. At some point in the coming months I want to revisit the way that ReSpec does WebIDL and find something that has nice integration with HTML (preferably as DRY as possible) but more WebIDL-oriented than what I currently have. If you want to sit down at some point to work out a nice syntax, I'd definitely be interested. Maybe at TPAC for instance? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 13:25:48 UTC