- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:53:45 +1200
- To: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hello team. I have amalgamated the "from mailing list" and "from tracker" SVG 2 requirements wiki pages into the one page: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input Cyril, you can now add in the SVG Tiny 1.2 features into that page. We discussed previously how we might quantify our responses to the requirements here so that we can settle on which feature we will work on in the SVG 2 timeframe. One method mention was to have a few different axes along which we'd rate the proposals -- priority, difficulty, importance, or something along those lines. (Apologies for not remembering exactly.) I'm wondering though whether that is too complex, and we should just settle for a single valued response. We essentially need to collapse the difficulty/importance/etc. into a single value so we can have a totally ordered list of features anyway, so why not do that up front. Also, if we don't have consensus on definitely including or definitely excluding features then we'll need to discuss them anyway. So for the moment, I have added a comments <table> for each item listed on the wiki page. You can add your comment by entering one of these four possibilities: {{ReqYes|Name|Rationale}} {{ReqMaybe|Name|Rationale}} {{ReqNo|Name|Rationale}} {{ReqUnsure|Name|Rationale}} for example: {{ReqYes|Cameron|Everybody wants this feature so we should just include it.}} If anyone objects to this rating scheme and wants something more fine grained, reply to this mail so we can discuss it briefly. Otherwise, please start looking at each of the items and putting your comments in. Some of the entries might be completely unspecific. People who are advocating for these entries should add some more details in this case. I have begun putting my comments in for the first few items on the list, and will continue with the remainder later in the week. I hope we can discuss some of these items and maybe assign actions to write more specific text or proposals for some of them at this week's call. Thanks, Cameron
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 05:54:32 UTC