Re: rotated path segment proposal

Leonard Rosenthol:
> So in this case, the second segment in the examples would NOT render
> in existing implementations – and (IMO) that would be BAD (as it's
> data loss).

I don’t see what the problem is with this.  Even if we did have a path
syntax error behaviour that meant that the R/F commands ignored and the
following segments are still rendered, the shape is going to be wrong.
If we want to, we could have a feature string so that authors could have
a fallback path using <switch>.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 00:02:59 UTC