- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:42:23 +1200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi Chris, Chris Lilley: > CM> * Updated FXTF Worksheet > CM> http://www.w3.org/mid/CA325DEA.AAD6%25vhardy@adobe.com > > I just wanted to report that this was discussed at the CSS WG call > yesterday, and the proposal (joint specs, specs that require review) > was accepted. So I have added them to the 'joint work' section of the > draft CSS WG charter, and we can have the same list in the SVG WG > charter. Thus, not much more to discuss here I think. Great! > CM> * Agenda for the FXTF day, coordination with CSS WG > > Microsoft confirmed that they would host that day, and I sent them our > current registered attendance (11 people) for room booking and lunch > purposes. Also great! > CM> * Moving forward with the OpenType/SVG Fonts proposal > > I think this is a good proposal, and SVG WG should liaise with the > OpenType people to ensure technical correctness, but its not an SVG WG > deliverable as such. We could add this work explicitly in the charter > under liaison. Adding it to the charter as a liaison topic sounds like a good idea. … > CM> - ICC profiles and compositing > CM> > CM> http://www.w3.org/mid/BC885F9E3DB48248A4C9FC7F2C57215C10877563@Hoefnix.dc.intranet … > I can take the action item to respond to the commentor and another > action item to make the spec changes. I’ve given you http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/3062 and http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/3063 Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 8 July 2011 03:42:51 UTC