Re: agenda, 7 July 2011 SVG WG telcon

Hi Chris,

Chris Lilley:
> CM> * Updated FXTF Worksheet
> CM>   http://www.w3.org/mid/CA325DEA.AAD6%25vhardy@adobe.com
> 
> I just wanted to report that this was discussed at the CSS WG call
> yesterday, and the proposal (joint specs, specs that require review)
> was accepted. So I have added them to the 'joint work' section of the
> draft CSS WG charter, and we can have the same list in the SVG WG
> charter. Thus, not much more to discuss here I think.

Great!

> CM> * Agenda for the FXTF day, coordination with CSS WG
> 
> Microsoft confirmed that they would host that day, and I sent them our
> current registered attendance (11 people) for room booking and lunch
> purposes.

Also great!

> CM> * Moving forward with the OpenType/SVG Fonts proposal
> 
> I think this is a good proposal, and SVG WG should liaise with the
> OpenType people to ensure technical correctness, but its not an SVG WG
> deliverable as such. We could add this work explicitly in the charter
> under liaison.

Adding it to the charter as a liaison topic sounds like a good idea.

…
> CM>   - ICC profiles and compositing
> CM>    
> CM> http://www.w3.org/mid/BC885F9E3DB48248A4C9FC7F2C57215C10877563@Hoefnix.dc.intranet
…
> I can take the action item to respond to the commentor and another
> action item to make the spec changes.

I’ve given you

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/3062 and
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/3063

Thanks,

Cameron

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Friday, 8 July 2011 03:42:51 UTC