- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:53:32 +0100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi Cameron, See my comments below. Le 06/12/2010 23:03, Cameron McCormack a écrit : > ISSUE-2368 is as follows: > > The grammar for path data uses the following grammar: > [[ > floating-point-constant: > fractional-constant exponent? > | digit-sequence exponent > ]] > It seems that if no fractional-constant is used (no '.') an exponent > component is required. > > The same problem is present in the grammar for points in polygons and > polylines, because the grammar is duplicated. > > I don’t think there is a problem, because floating-point-constant is not > intended to capture numbers that match /^[0-9]+$/. The only references > to floating-point-constant are: > > nonnegative-number: > integer-constant > | floating-point-constant > number: > sign? integer-constant > | sign? floating-point-constant > integer-constant: > digit-sequence > > so we’re safe. Cyril: can you confirm? I see my mistake. I had missed the 'integer-constant' type which indeed captures the numbers that match /^[0-9]+$/. I confirm we're safe. > > The issue also has: > > Finally, there should be tests in the test suite with: > - a number with no digit after and before a "." > - a number no digit after exponent > > so I’ve raised ISSUE-2393 on the SVG 2 test suite to add such tests. Thanks. > > Finally, I see that ISSUE-2368 is on “SVG 1.1 F2 Last Call”, but the > original Last Call comment is not linked from the issue. Was there one? > Or was it just from Cyril? If the latter, I guess it shouldn’t be a LC > comment. You're probably right. There was no LC comment, just a comment during the Paris F2F meeting. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.wp.institut-telecom.fr/
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 08:53:50 UTC