- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:07:52 +0100
- To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 9:34:38 AM, Erik wrote: ED> Below is the agenda for the SVG WG telcon on Wednesday 19 January 2011 ED> at: ED> 1130 San Francisco ED> 1430 Raleigh ED> 1930 UTC ED> 2030 Stockholm ED> 0630 Sydney (Thursday) ED> 0830 Auckland (Thursday) ED> Agenda: ED> * SVG 1.1F2 progress ED> ED> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Full_11#Remaining_work_for_SVG1.1F2 ED> http://www.w3.org/2010/09/SVG1.1SE-LastCall/dump.html ED> * Test suite results ED> ED> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/status/implementation_matrix.html ED> Batik (partial) results are in, still waiting for webkit. Partial results for Abbra Vidualize are also posted http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/status/publish/abbra-2010-12-09.xml but not yet in the test suite result matrix. ED> Specific tests to discuss: ED> + animate-elem-81-t ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/20110109235004.GA26353@wok.mcc.id.au Abbra pass ED> + interact-pevents-04-t ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/op.vosgi0iegeuyw5@localhost Abbra fail ED> + conform-viewers-02-f ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/20101217190531.GB31176@wok.mcc.id.au Abbra fail And I think the test is wrong, because the data UIR scheme allows for a content-type but not a content-encoding; thus the test conflicts with http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/conform.html#ConformingSVGServers ED> + painting-marker-05-f ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/20110103222418.GB11671@wok.mcc.id.au Not yet tested in abbra ED> + text-align-07-t.svg ED> Are missing-glyphs ok here? If so what's the expected alignment? Not yet tested in abbra Missing glyphs are ok as a test result. They are not okay as a reference image, because if you *don't* get missing glyphs in your test result, you need to know what the right ones look like. Whether missing glyph should be aligned (and otherwise treated) as the correct glyph is not defined, I think, for SVG or for CSS or for Unicode. ED> + text-text-05-t.svg ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/20110113195132.GB16622@wok.mcc.id.au Not yet tested in abbra No ED> And WOFF fallback for SVGFreeSans: ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/20110112034523.GH4160@wok.mcc.id.au I made the fonts. The tests need to be bulk edited to add another font to the head of the font stack and to add the @font-face. ED> * stroke-linecap on zero-length subpaths ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/20110118225137.GA12109@wok.mcc.id.au ED> * Role Attribute LC ED> http://www.w3.org/mid/op.vpjq7isxgeuyw5@localhost I haven't had chance to look at that yet. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 19:13:49 UTC