- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 18:33:44 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Thursday, December 9, 2010, 5:28:29 PM, Chris wrote: CL> In my opinion the 1.2T test is better, with the text being CL> larger. I suggest that the current test be copied over to a new, CL> unapproved test which tests both alignment and ligatures, and the CL> 1.2T test body content be used here for the approved test. The CL> 1.2T pass criteria are better, too. OK I have done the following: * preserve old -06 as new unapproved -11 * use approved 1.2T -06 as new -06, adding clearer pass criteria * copy new -06 as new unapproved -12, using a woff rather than system fonts * make a woff font for -12 using SIL Scherezade, which is available under the OFL (the OT file and the license xml are also checked in) * saved an image patch (made from a screen grab from opera) in imagePatches -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 17:34:04 UTC