- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:49:01 +0100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:54:25 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Hi Chris. > > Some comments on this change: > > Chris Lilley via cvs-syncmail: >> + <dd> >> + <p> >> + The rootmost >> + <a href="struct.html#SVGElement"><span >> class="element-name">'svg'</span></a> >> + element is the furthest >> + <a href="struct.html#SVGElement"><span >> class="element-name">'svg'</span></a> >> + ancestor element that does not exit an >> + <a href="intro.html#TermSVGContext"><span class="svg-term">SVG >> context</span></a>. >> + See also >> + <a href="intro.html#TermSVGDocumentFragment"><span >> class="svg-term">SVG document fragment</span></a>. >> + </p> >> + </dd> > > Is the definition of “rootmost ‘svg’ element” materially different from > “outermost ‘svg’ element”, which is already in the spec? It would be > good to have only the one definition, if they are not. I think that they're meant to be the same thing, and yes it would be nice to only have one of them. Would take some spec grepping I guess, but it shouldn't be too hard to do. >> Index: coords.html >> … >> +<h2 id="IntrinsicSizing">Intrinsic sizing properties of the viewport >> of SVG content</h2> >> +<p>SVG needs to specify how to calculate some intrinsic sizing >> properties to >> +enable inclusion within other languages. The intrinsic width and height >> +of the <a href="intro.html#TermViewport"><span >> class="svg-term">viewport</span></a> of SVG content must be determined >> from the <a href="struct.html#SVGElementWidthAttribute"><span >> class="attr-name">'width'</span></a> and <a >> href="struct.html#SVGElementHeightAttribute"><span >> +class="attr-name">'height'</span></a> >> + attributes. If either of these are not specified, the >> + lacuna value >> + of <span class="attr-value">'100%'</span> must >> + be used. <em>Note:</em> the <a >> href="struct.html#SVGElementWidthAttribute"><span >> class="attr-name">'width'</span></a> and <a >> href="struct.html#SVGElementHeightAttribute"><span > > SVG 1.1 doesn’t have the lacuna value definition. I think we can just > do s/lacuna// here. The SVG 1.1 LC draft does have "lacuna value" defined, see http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/intro.html#TermLacunaValue. ... [definition for intrinsic size etc] ... > SVG 1.1 doesn’t have the ‘none’ value for viewBox. I think we can just > delete that parenthetical clause there. Agreed. ... >> +<div class="examplesource"> >> +<pre><![CDATA[<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.2" >> baseProfile="tiny" >> + width="10cm" height="5cm"> >> + ... >> +</svg>]]></pre> >> +</div> >> +</div> > > The styling of these examples doesn’t seem to match those in the rest of > the 1.1 spec. Also I don’t think we should be using version="1.2" > baseProfile="tiny" there. > > I can make these changes if you agree. Yeah, would be good if the examples matched the 1.1 style. Cheers /Erik -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Monday, 22 November 2010 11:49:37 UTC