- From: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:48:42 +0000
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Sorry, I think the definition of conforming static vs. dynamic is misleading. I would like someone to state why renaming the tests is a lot of work, or why this is a bad thing for developers, and why this is taking so long. I've been discussing this for six months and I do not see what it is such a big issue to make things clear. Patrick ________________________________________ From: public-svg-wg-request@w3.org [public-svg-wg-request@w3.org] on behalf of Doug Schepers [schepers@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 5:55 PM To: Alex Danilo Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Minutes Oct 28 2010 telcon Hi, Alex- Alex Danilo wrote (on 10/28/10 7:53 PM): > > Sorry I couldn't attend the call - the telconfs clash with getting > kids ready in the morning. We could reschedule the telcon, if you would like to attend. We're changing to only a single telcon a week, which may also help. > Anyway, reading the minutes and the discussion regarding the tests > and use of animation, etc. I have as suggestion to consider. > > Firstly, renaming the tests etc. is a lot of work and I agree with > Erik on that point. The group over the years has spent an inordinate amount > of time on the existing tests, and a radical change now is likely to overload > everyone on the group for little benefit. We're only talking about 10 tests or so. > However the spec. does have descriptive text regarding "conforming > static viewers" and "conforming dynamic viewers", etc. > > So my suggestion is to split the test suite into 2 sets: set 1 is > all the tests that a conforming static viewer should handle; set 2 is the > set that includes SMIL animation. That way the implementation report will > have a clear demarcation between the 2 types of viewers and that avoids > having to rename everything 'animate-elem...' etc. That seems like a reasonable idea to me, as well. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Saturday, 30 October 2010 14:49:18 UTC