W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2010

RE: test writing guidelines regarding use of red

From: Anthony Grasso <Anthony.Grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 04:08:12 +0000
To: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <923A4276C1903646BE5299CA8462B0A005CD13@EXM02-WVP.cisra.canon.com.au>
We should probably consider putting together some guidelines that incorporate these suggestions for when we start construct tests for SVG 2.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-svg-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-svg-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alex Danilo
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 October 2010 2:44 PM
> To: Cameron McCormack
> Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: test writing guidelines regarding use of red
> Hi Cam,
>       I like your suggestion.
>       There was some talk about removing red in test successes which has
> been done for the 1.1F2 tests. Someone (Chris?) complained about blank
> tests being passes. I don't like the idea of blank for success at all -
> may be easy for bitmap comparison but very human unfriendly.
>       So +1 for the 3 bullets below.
> Alex
> --Original Message--:
> >Hi.
> >
> >I’m reviewing some of the Microsoft test submissions.  Take
> >styling-pres-05-f as an example.  The test is good in that red is used
> >to indicate test failure, but when the test succeeds the shapes (that
> >would otherwise be red if the test failed) are set to fill:none.  The
> >resulting test slide if the test passes is blank apart from the CVS
> >revision.  Do we have test writing guidelines written down somewhere?
> >I’m thinking we should be following rules like:
> >
> >  * If any red is showing, the test failed.
> >  * If any green is showing and no red is showing, the test passed.
> >  * Otherwise, you need to read the pass criteria.
> >
> >--
> >Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

> >
> >

The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your system.
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 04:08:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:44 UTC