- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:18:52 +0200
- To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Leonard- Leonard Rosenthol wrote (on 9/3/10 4:41 PM): > Why is this something that needs to be standardized, as opposed to > something that is application/implementation-centric? Because without a clear indication on what to do, there is unlikely to be interoperability between different applications, which is the point of standards. Many implementations may not even know what to do with SVG content. Providing guidance may help them see new possibilities they hadn't considered, thus helping improve SVG's usability and suitability as an interchange format, as well as a dynamic interactive web format. I would expect Adobe to want to have their SVG products behave as well as possible with other programs, since that helps the users. > You can't know every type of application and how they will use the > various elements contained inside the SVG. And some applications > give users choices (eg. "Paste Special") about how data should be > transferred. Of course, but we can outline several options for copy-paste and let the implementation decide which classes of pasting it is capable of and wants to support. At some level, this may come down to what the underlying platform allows, but perhaps even that could be influenced by a spec like SVG, which has such broad support. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 20:18:56 UTC