Re: Investigate ISSUE-2341 and look for previous comments

Hi, Chris-

Chris Lilley wrote (on 7/29/10 9:48 AM):
> On Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 12:29:00 PM, Doug wrote:
> DS> We had previously decided not to tackle this in SVG 1.1, but to
> DS> address it in SVG 2.  Are you suggesting we reopen this for SVG 1.1?
> Well, I have the action as part of an SVG 1.1SE last call comment.
> And since the earlier discussion from 2007-2008, which was referred
> to in the last call comment, resulted in some clarifications to Tiny
> 1.2 which is already a Rec, I propose to copy over that section
> because it makes things clearer and is already in a Rec.
> Any wider discussion and more sweeping changes should be deferred to
> 2.0, I agree.

That seems like a good course of action.  I'm reluctant to make more 
changes than we need to, because I want SVG 1.1 SE out the door. :)

-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 14:19:39 UTC