W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Investigate ISSUE-2341 and look for previous comments

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:19:37 -0400
Message-ID: <4C518DF9.1000206@w3.org>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi, Chris-

Chris Lilley wrote (on 7/29/10 9:48 AM):
> On Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 12:29:00 PM, Doug wrote:
> DS> We had previously decided not to tackle this in SVG 1.1, but to
> DS> address it in SVG 2.  Are you suggesting we reopen this for SVG 1.1?
>
> Well, I have the action as part of an SVG 1.1SE last call comment.
>
> And since the earlier discussion from 2007-2008, which was referred
> to in the last call comment, resulted in some clarifications to Tiny
> 1.2 which is already a Rec, I propose to copy over that section
> because it makes things clearer and is already in a Rec.
>
> Any wider discussion and more sweeping changes should be deferred to
> 2.0, I agree.

That seems like a good course of action.  I'm reluctant to make more 
changes than we need to, because I want SVG 1.1 SE out the door. :)

Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 14:19:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:12 UTC