- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:19:37 -0400
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi, Chris- Chris Lilley wrote (on 7/29/10 9:48 AM): > On Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 12:29:00 PM, Doug wrote: > DS> We had previously decided not to tackle this in SVG 1.1, but to > DS> address it in SVG 2. Are you suggesting we reopen this for SVG 1.1? > > Well, I have the action as part of an SVG 1.1SE last call comment. > > And since the earlier discussion from 2007-2008, which was referred > to in the last call comment, resulted in some clarifications to Tiny > 1.2 which is already a Rec, I propose to copy over that section > because it makes things clearer and is already in a Rec. > > Any wider discussion and more sweeping changes should be deferred to > 2.0, I agree. That seems like a good course of action. I'm reluctant to make more changes than we need to, because I want SVG 1.1 SE out the door. :) Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 14:19:39 UTC