- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:14:59 -0500
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi, Chris- Chris Lilley wrote (on 2/12/10 10:30 AM): > Hello public-svg-wg, > > Philippe has just updated the W3C guide to suggest licensing wording for specifications that include APIs or bindings > http://www.w3.org/Guide/binding-license.html > > We should put the same language in our specs. Well-spotted, Chris. I strongly agree. For convenience, we may still want to provide the raw bindings in a separate file, but it makes sense to have the bindings in the document be under the same reusable license (rather than the more restrictive document license). As a side note, I had to issue an errata on Element Traversal exactly for this reason... I'd forgotten to supply the bindings as a separate document, leading to license problems. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 17:15:02 UTC