Re: binding license language

Hi, Chris-

Chris Lilley wrote (on 2/12/10 10:30 AM):
> Hello public-svg-wg,
> Philippe has just updated the W3C guide to suggest licensing wording for specifications that include APIs or bindings
> We should put the same language in our specs.

Well-spotted, Chris.  I strongly agree.  For convenience, we may still 
want to provide the raw bindings in a separate file, but it makes sense 
to have the bindings in the document be under the same reusable license 
(rather than the more restrictive document license).

As a side note, I had to issue an errata on Element Traversal exactly 
for this reason... I'd forgotten to supply the bindings as a separate 
document, leading to license problems.

-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 17:15:02 UTC