W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Agenda June 22, 2010 SVG WG telcon

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:34:24 +0200
Message-ID: <1635860130.20100622213424@w3.org>
To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 12:27:51 PM, Erik wrote:

ED> Hello svg-wg,

ED>    time: June 22, 2010, 20.00 UTC [1]
ED>    phone bridge: +1 617-761-6200 (Zakim)
ED>    passcode: 7841

I have not had confirmation of the telcon booking change, so we may need to use a temporary conference code this week.

ED>    irc channel: #svg on irc.w3.org:6665

ED> Please take note of the new telcon time for Tuesday (replaces the Monday
ED> telcon time). The telcon time for Thursdays is still the same as before.

ED> Agenda:

ED> * Publishing SVG 1.1

Published a couple of hours ago

ED>     - tracking comments

We could use an issue in tracker, or we could maintain some sort of xml document as we have in the past, 

or we could use the W3C last call comment tracker


although documentation is ... scanty. It seems to want a single-page spec but seems unable to handle a long single page spec.

Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /afs/w3.org/pub/WWW/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/comments.phi  on line 586

I think we need something a bit more robust.

ED> * Telcon schedule over the summer

My regrets for Thurs 24th, Tues 29th and Thurs 1 July (travel).
Starting 16 Aug I will be on travel right up to the Paris f2f and SVG Open.

ED> * SVG 1.1 testsuite

There are a few open actions and one open issue

Inkscape contributed an implementation report (or rather, a new harness with images made by inkscape as well as the svg and referece PNG, so someone can go through the harness and collect together an implementation report).

ED> * [CSS21] Cascade of SVG presentational attributes
ED>     http://www.w3.org/mid/4C1A8A47.6060203@inkedblade.net

The same somewhat funky language was in 1.1 first edition

The proposed wording for CSS 2.1 looks good to me.

The proposed wording for other SVG specs looks a bit short (I would tend to reiterate the important "specificity zero" part) but otherwise good.

 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 19:34:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:43 UTC