Re: paths-data-20-f.svg

On Friday, May 21, 2010, 2:25:09 PM, Chris wrote:

CL> I also don't see any errata that relate to this test. As its at
CL> the end of the table of errata tests, that means it was added
CL> later on. I don't find a mention in minutes about that though.

Of course I find relevant minutes right after sending that mail

http://www.w3.org/2010/04/12-svg-minutes.html#item01

ED: I think the grammar for the elliptical has been fixed

<ed> paths-data-20-f.svg

ED: I added a test for it
... would like some one to view the test

DS: Jeff Schiller had more to say about the syntax on the mailing list

ED: My update was after his email
... it covers white space after the first and second flags

DS: We could mention at least in the context of SVG 2.0
... a lacuna value for any given coordinate that is out of range
... can say it is assumed to be zero

ED: I'm not sure really
... if you want to go with 1 or 0 then you have a bias

DS: It's only cases where the arc flags are messed up
... what do you do with it?

ED: We just check if its 1 or 0 that's all
... if it's say 2
... we just say it's invalid
... you can't really parse it as anything else


Looks like that discussion took place without noticing that, as Alex points out, there has been language in the spec since SVG 1.0 saying what to do with such a value.


-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG

Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 12:29:20 UTC