On Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 2:26:27 PM, Chris wrote: CL> So in summary we have CL> a) correct wording proposed by jwatt at a f2f and agreed by all present (including cameron) CL> b) a couple of mysterious actions which changed that wording, CL> making it incompatible with what implementations do and with SVGT1.2 CL> I am going to go through types.html and remove the erroneous "or in a CL> property's corresponding <a>presentation attribute</a>" CL> throughout, and restore the good wording that jwatt proposed and we all agreed to. Done. CL> I will add a test (on, say, stroke width) that checks that syntax CL> if we don't already have one. Also done, needs reviewer. http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/types-basic-01-f.svg Closing CL> ACTION-2765 CL> Fix the definition of number to allow scientific notation in attribute values CL> ACTION-2730 CL> Fix the broken grammar for scientific notation in SVG 1.1 and 1.2T and mentioning, for the record, CL> ACTION-2602 CL> (ACTION-2615) -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:52:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:43 UTC
