- From: Glenn Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:57:32 +0800
- To: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <g2v94ad087a1004290457r776328e9t4738dda7ab553609@mail.gmail.com>
note that XSL-FO considers vertical-align to be a shorthand property that maps to value sets of { alignment-baseline, alignment-adjust, baseline-shift, dominant-baseline } properties; my point is: there is not a simple relationship between vertical-align and baseline-shift that would suggest substituting the former for the latter; http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/#vertical-align regards, glenn adams On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:40 PM, SVG Working Group Issue Tracker < sysbot+tracker@w3.org <sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org>> wrote: > > ISSUE-2322 (baselineshift-verticalalign): Should SVG 2.0 deprecate > baseline-shift and use vertical-align instead [SVG 2.0] > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2322 > > Raised by: Erik Dahlström > On product: SVG 2.0 > > >From Robert Longson[1]: > > Why did SVG define baseline-shift > (http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html#BaselineShiftProperty) rather than > using the existing vertical-align > (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align) CSS > property? > > Should SVG 2.0 deprecate baseline-shift and use vertical-align instead? > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/mid/r2s31fc788d1004272352u8dcac33k5292aa476c779466@mail.gmail.com > > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:58:05 UTC