W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ISSUE-2322 (baselineshift-verticalalign): Should SVG 2.0 deprecate baseline-shift and use vertical-align instead [SVG 2.0]

From: Glenn Adams <gadams@xfsi.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:57:32 +0800
Message-ID: <g2v94ad087a1004290457r776328e9t4738dda7ab553609@mail.gmail.com>
To: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
note that XSL-FO considers vertical-align to be a shorthand property that
maps to value sets of { alignment-baseline, alignment-adjust,
baseline-shift, dominant-baseline } properties; my point is: there is not a
simple relationship between vertical-align and baseline-shift that would
suggest substituting the former for the latter;

http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/#vertical-align

regards,
glenn adams

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:40 PM, SVG Working Group Issue Tracker <
sysbot+tracker@w3.org <sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org>> wrote:

>
> ISSUE-2322 (baselineshift-verticalalign): Should SVG 2.0 deprecate
> baseline-shift and use vertical-align instead [SVG 2.0]
>
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2322
>
> Raised by: Erik Dahlström
> On product: SVG 2.0
>
> >From Robert Longson[1]:
>
> Why did SVG define baseline-shift
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/text.html#BaselineShiftProperty) rather than
> using the existing vertical-align
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#propdef-vertical-align) CSS
> property?
>
> Should SVG 2.0 deprecate baseline-shift and use vertical-align instead?
>
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/mid/r2s31fc788d1004272352u8dcac33k5292aa476c779466@mail.gmail.com
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:58:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:43 UTC