- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:48:57 +0200
- To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
- CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 4:21:58 PM, Erik wrote: ED> Hi Chris, ED> I've reviewed your filters-displacement-02-f.svg testcase, adding pass ED> criteria and some more testcase description text. Please verify that the ED> changes are ok, I've marked the test as reviewed for now. I noted that ED> firefox displayed the bottom gradient with a reddish tint applied (making ED> it look different from the top gradient which is using essentially the ED> same filter). Thanks, I will have a look (but am getting ready for another telcon at the moment). ED> P.S. As a side-effect of reviewing, I also noticed that we had lost some ED> information that was visible in the old 1.1 spec. Default values that were ED> shown in the DTD snippets are not there anymore since we use the new spec ED> style for elements. I updated the 1.1F2 spec to explicitly mention the ED> default values for xChannelSelector and yChannelSelector [2]. Ouch. We need to do a pass through the whole 1.1 spec looking for things that depended on DTD defaulting. On the other hand, the explicit prose is clearer and easier to understand than reading a DTD snippet or schema snippet. Do we define 'lacuna value' in 1.1SE? ED> [1] ED> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/filters-displace-02-f.svg ED> [2] ED> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/filters.html#feDisplacementMapXChannelSelectorAttribute -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:14:50 UTC