- From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:51:30 +1000
- To: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi All, In regard to SVG Color: --Original Message--: > ><snip/> > CL: I don't know > ... some of them allow negative colors to express out of gamut > colours > > <ChrisL> fairly sure that some allow > 1.0 for headroom; believe > trhat some cms allow negative values and others clip > > CM: I think 0 to 1 makes more sense > > CL: Which would be compatible with what 1.1 says > ... values greater than 1 or less than 0 would be out of the profile > gamut but no necessarily out of the target gamut > ... I'd be fine with that > > RESOLUTION: A float in the range 0 to 1 like SVG 1.1 and no > Scientific notation > >conformance Fluorescent colours require values > 1. So conformance-wise the resolution is OK, but implementations should be free to represent values > 1 and < 0. Also, the resolution for no scientific notation is a bit silly. It's OK to not require it for conformance, but if an implementation chooses to parse scientific values that are in the 0->1 range, then it should be allowed (BTW, I do). Alex
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 13:52:08 UTC