public-svg-issues@w3.org from February 2021 by date

Friday, 26 February 2021

• Re: [svgwg] Duplicate definitions of SVGPathElement and SVGMarkerElement (#824) Cameron McCormack via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Duplicate definitions of SVGPathElement and SVGMarkerElement (#824) Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by tabatkins Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Use constructor operation for ShadowAnimation Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub

Wednesday, 24 February 2021

• Re: [svgwg] Building a schema for SVG / Creating an SVG profile for IEC 61850-6-2 (#699) dtessier32 via GitHub

Monday, 22 February 2021

• Re: [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827) Dr. Olaf Hoffmann via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Add a way to create conic gradients (#785) 一丝 via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827) 一丝 via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827) Dr. Olaf Hoffmann via GitHub

Saturday, 20 February 2021

• Re: [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827) Fredrik Söderqvist via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827) 一丝 via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827) 一丝 via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827) Fredrik Söderqvist via GitHub
• [svgwg] Clarified path data omission rules (#827) 一丝 via GitHub

Friday, 19 February 2021

• Re: [svgwg] Use constructor operation for ShadowAnimation (#825) Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Duplicate definitions of SVGPathElement and SVGMarkerElement (#824) Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-paths] Is this spec still a thing? (#818) Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Closed: [svgwg] [svg-paths] Is this spec still a thing? (#818) Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-paths] Is this spec still a thing? (#818) Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub

Thursday, 18 February 2021

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-paths] Is this spec still a thing? (#818) Kagami Sascha Rosylight via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-paths] Is this spec still a thing? (#818) Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-paths] Is this spec still a thing? (#818) Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-paths] Is this spec still a thing? (#818) Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

Wednesday, 17 February 2021

• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: [svg-paths] Add default value {} to getPathData argument Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• [svgwg] Pull Request: [svg-paths] Add default value {} to getPathData argument Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Provide text-to-path-data conversion method (#221) ashleedawg via GitHub

Tuesday, 16 February 2021

• [svgwg] Pull Request: Use constructor operation for ShadowAnimation Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

Friday, 12 February 2021

• [svgwg] Duplicate definitions of SVGPathElement and SVGMarkerElement (#824) Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

Tuesday, 9 February 2021

• Re: [svgwg] Allow transforms on textPath (#210) Philip Rogers via GitHub

Monday, 8 February 2021

• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: [color] Double link wraps in Bikeshed Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] [color] Double link wraps in Bikeshed (#823) Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] [color] Double link wraps in Bikeshed (#823) W3C Bot via GitHub
• [svgwg] Pull Request: [color] Double link wraps in Bikeshed Nick Schonning via GitHub

Wednesday, 3 February 2021

• Re: [svgwg] Unclear step in Text Layout Algorithm (section 11.5) (#617) Mike Bremford via GitHub

Last message date: Friday, 26 February 2021 21:53:20 UTC