public-svg-issues@w3.org from November 2019 by date

Saturday, 30 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) Boris Dalstein via GitHub

Friday, 29 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) tatarize via GitHub

Thursday, 28 November 2019

• [svgwg] Pull Request: Make the .gitignore patterns more robust, and simpler Jonathan Watt via GitHub
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by heycam Cameron McCormack via GitHub
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Remove old files from when we used Mercurial Cameron McCormack via GitHub
• [svgwg] Pull Request: Remove old files from when we used Mercurial Jonathan Watt via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Subtleties of the path data grammar (#752) tatarize via GitHub

Tuesday, 26 November 2019

• [svgwg] new commits pushed by heycam Cameron McCormack via GitHub
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Fix `make stabilize-issues-all-specs` Cameron McCormack via GitHub
• [svgwg] Pull Request: Fix `make stabilize-issues-all-specs` Jonathan Watt via GitHub
• [svgwg] Change arc grammar to coordinates rather than numbers and flags. (#755) tatarize via GitHub

Sunday, 24 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) tatarize via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) tatarize via GitHub

Saturday, 23 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) tatarize via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Zambonifofex via GitHub

Friday, 22 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Dr. Olaf Hoffmann via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) tatarize via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Subtleties of the path data grammar (#752) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Subtleties of the path data grammar (#752) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Closed: [svgwg] Subtleties of the path data grammar (#752) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Zambonifofex via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Paul LeBeau via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Zambonifofex via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Paul LeBeau via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Zambonifofex via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Zambonifofex via GitHub
• [svgwg] consider more involved path shapes (#754) Zambonifofex via GitHub

Thursday, 21 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Subtleties of the path data grammar (#752) Zambonifofex via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Add support for the `hidden`-attribute (#508) Zoë Bijl via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Add support for the `hidden`-attribute (#508) Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Add support for the `hidden`-attribute (#508) Zoë Bijl via GitHub

Wednesday, 20 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Add support for the `hidden`-attribute (#508) Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Add support for the `hidden`-attribute (#508) CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] SVG 2 spec section 13.5.7 (probably) incorrect for miter-clip (and arcs?) (#745) CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub
• [svgwg] Rect decomposition is invalid (#753) tatarize via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Subtleties of the path data grammar (#752) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Subtleties of the path data grammar (#752) Paul LeBeau via GitHub

Tuesday, 19 November 2019

• [svgwg] Subtleties of the path data grammar (#752) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• [svgwg] Issue: Text with multiple x="" values should be shaped as if it was not broken (#631) marked as i18n-comment r12a via GitHub

Monday, 18 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Use shorter symbol names in SVG path data grammar (#751) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Use shorter symbol names in SVG path data grammar (#751) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Use shorter symbol names in SVG path data grammar (#751) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• [svgwg] Use shorter symbol names in SVG path data grammar (#751) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• [svgwg] Issue: Third parameter of arc in path data should allow signed numbers (#750) marked as Paths chapter Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Third parameter of arc in path data should allow signed numbers (#750) Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Third parameter of arc in path data should allow signed numbers (#750) Boris Dalstein via GitHub
• [svgwg] Third parameter of arc in path data should allow signed numbers (#750) Boris Dalstein via GitHub

Saturday, 16 November 2019

• [svgwg] new commits pushed by litherum Myles C. Maxfield via GitHub
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Rebase the SVG Native spec on top of SVG 2 Myles C. Maxfield via GitHub

Sunday, 10 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Need to better define what rules apply to an element in an <svg:use> subtree. (#504) George Steel via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Need to better define what rules apply to an element in an <svg:use> subtree. (#504) Fredrik Söderqvist via GitHub
• [svgwg] [animations] Remove the 'timelinebegin' attribute (#749) Fredrik Söderqvist via GitHub

Saturday, 9 November 2019

• [svgwg] Pull Request: Rebase the SVG Native spec on top of SVG 2 Myles C. Maxfield via GitHub

Friday, 8 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] SVG2 spec means elements within a <use> tag can not be targeted for styling (#367) Dirk Schulze via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Need to better define what rules apply to an element in an <svg:use> subtree. (#504) Dirk Schulze via GitHub
• [svgwg] Issue: Add support for the `hidden`-attribute (#508) marked as Agenda+ Dirk Schulze via GitHub
• [svgwg] Issue: Discard "discard" elements (#717) marked as Agenda+ Dirk Schulze via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) Dirk Schulze via GitHub

Thursday, 7 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) Fredrik Söderqvist via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) Philip Rogers via GitHub

Wednesday, 6 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] stacking context / rendering order requirements are mostly not Web compatible (#463) Nikolas Zimmermann via GitHub

Monday, 4 November 2019

• Re: [svgwg] Clarify Event attributes section (#467) CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] [13. Gradients and Patterns] gradientUnits in SVG Native (#746) CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub

Last message date: Saturday, 30 November 2019 11:26:09 UTC