Re: SVG A11y Task Force

Hello Rich, Jason,

Apologies for not yet following up on my thread from earlier in the month;
I had been meaning to do so.

As it stands, I see no purpose to having regular meetings. If anyone is
working on projects related to this task force, please keep us updated via
this mailing list. If items arise that require discussion, we can arrange
teleconferences on an ad-hoc basis.

If you want work to progress on any of the projects or tasks, you need to
convince stakeholders to get involved & devote resources.

~Amelia

On 2 February 2017 at 11:43, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* Rich Schwerdtfeger [mailto:richschwer@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 2, 2017 12:57 PM
>
> What is the status of the task force? I read the following post to the
> list but I have not seen any minutes posted beyond that date.
>
> *[Jason]By way of interesting coincidence, I recently searched back
> through my mail and found that, indeed, there’s nothing on record since
> that thread, and I was wondering what further work, if any, was planned.*
>
>
>
> *If work proceeds on the larger graphics taxonomy (i.e., not just the
> minimal one that has been completed so far), then I’m interested. I’m also
> interested in whether any specific support is needed in SVG for tactile
> graphics embossers and, if they become available, dynamic tactile graphics
> displays, such as the product foreshadowed at*
>
> http://www.aph.org/graphiti/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>