- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:26:06 -0600
- To: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-svg-a11y@w3.org" <public-svg-a11y@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFD3EA123A.15F75522-ON86257DD6.004CC84D-86257DD6.005A479C@us.ibm.com>
Thanks Erik. response below. Rich Schwerdtfeger Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com> wrote on 01/23/2015 07:24:32 AM: > From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com> > To: "public-svg-a11y@w3.org" <public-svg-a11y@w3.org> > Date: 01/23/2015 07:25 AM > Subject: A couple of comments on SVG2 Accessibility API Mappings > > Hi, > > some early comments on > http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/svg-aam/svg-aam.html. > > == Intro section - > http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/svg-aam/svg-aam.html#intro == > > > "Unlike earlier versions of SVG, SVG2 also closely aligns with the DOM > > Level 3 Core and HTML5 events to facilitate JavaScript use." > > I would suggest dropping the first half of this sentence. SVG Tiny 1.2 did > require a subset of DOM Level 3 Core. SVG has supported JavaScript > (ECMAScript) since version 1.0, so it's not new in SVG2 (which seems to be > implied). > done. > > "With SVG2, authors will now be able to produce rich ineractive charts, > > and drawings while be accessible to a much broader range of users > > allowing the author to dynamically supply their intended semantics > > through through the use of WAI-ARIA." > > *interactive. This also seems to imply that rich interactive charts is > something new in SVG2, where really it's the a11y that's being improved > here. Would it be possible for this section to convey that message in a > better way? > done. > > == Mapping WAI-ARIA to Accessibility APIs - > http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/svg-aam/svg-aam.html#mapping_conflicts == > > > "SVG user agents must conform to Conflicts between native markup > > semantics and WAI-ARIA in [CORE-AAM] where the host language is [SVG2]." > > Not sure if it's an important distinction to make here, but svg UA's thus > far have tended to not care about which specific version of SVG was used > for the markup, and svg2 has even removed the 'version' attribute on <svg>. > > Should this just say "SVG" instead of "SVG2"? I assume the intent is that > svg-aam should still apply to e.g SVG3. > I understand. I have been working to the SVG2 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/ What I will do is make this [SVG] and then link to this rec. track version of the spec. for now. We should think about this in the title of the SVG2 spec which currently says: Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 2 I have made the changes to have this refer to SVG. > > == SVG2 Element Mapping Table - > http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/svg-aam/svg-aam.html#mapping_role_table > == > > feCustom has been dropped from the Filter Effects spec, suggest removing > it here too. See http://www.w3.org/TR/filter-effects/#changes. > done in the mapping spec. and the SVG2 spec. for the aria section. > > -- > Erik Dahlstrom, Web Technology Developer, Opera Software > Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group >
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 16:27:26 UTC