- From: Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:30:13 -0700
- To: Satish S <satish@google.com>
- Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEE5bcg8kC9H9k3dRo35TF5uVQVUcrrFUcg9XK7_RyxNrL7+eQ@mail.gmail.com>
I've updated the spec with this change: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/speech-api/rev/633e735be33e As always, the current draft spec is at: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/speech-api/raw-file/tip/speechapi.html On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com> wrote: > Yes. > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Satish S <satish@google.com> wrote: > >> > this constraint is already inherent in the spec because only a single >> final result may be returned in continuous mode (5.1.1) >> >> I guess you meant to say "only a single final result may be returned in >> non-continuous mode"? >> >> Cheers >> Satish >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Glen Shires <gshires@google.com> wrote: >> >>> I propose eliminating from the definition of resultIndex the sentence: >>> "When continuous was false, the resultIndex must always be 0." >>> >>> While this is true when returning the final result, this constraint is >>> already inherent in the spec because only a single final result may be >>> returned in continuous mode (5.1.1) and the results list must never contain >>> interim results before final results (5.1.8). >>> >>> However, it is not necessarily true when returning interim results (for >>> example, when only some of the interim results need to be overwritten). >>> >>> If there's no disagreement, I'll remove this sentence from the spec on >>> Tuesday. >>> >>> /Glen Shires >>> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 09:31:26 UTC