- From: Raj\(Openstream\) <raj@openstream.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:25:21 -0400
- To: "Young, Milan" <Milan.Young@nuance.com>, "Glen Shires" <gshires@google.com>, <public-speech-api@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 20:25:46 UTC
I second that...SpeechSynthesizer sounds better and TextToSpeech is legacy.. ----- Original Message ----- From: Young, Milan To: Glen Shires ; public-speech-api@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 4:20 PM Subject: RE: Rename "TTS" object to "TextToSpeech" I liked SpeechSynthesizer because it went well with SpeechRecognizer. But I don't object to TextToSpeech. From: Glen Shires [mailto:gshires@google.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:03 AM To: public-speech-api@w3.org Subject: Rename "TTS" object to "TextToSpeech" I propose we rename the "TTS" object "TextToSpeech". There seems to be agreement that TTS is too short [1], and is an acronym that may not be familiar to some developers. TextToSpeech adds clarity, while still being reasonably short and easy to spell. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-speech-api-contrib/2012Apr/0005.html /Glen Shires
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 20:25:46 UTC