- From: Satish S <satish@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:14:08 +0100
- To: Jerry Carter <jerry@jerrycarter.org>
- Cc: "Young, Milan" <Milan.Young@nuance.com>, Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com>, "public-speech-api@w3.org" <public-speech-api@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHZf7RmShnK6M3nVqebQ7KwsA2Fqob1hwuQkH3JhCswdDeWg_A@mail.gmail.com>
Shouldn't that be up to the UA to decide? One use case is if the device did not have access to a recognizer capable of dictation-lite (e.g. recognizer is remote and device has no network access at that moment) the UA can decide to only use a local recognizer capable of recognizing names from the contact list or apps installed and nothing else. Cheers Satish On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jerry Carter <jerry@jerrycarter.org> wrote: > I concur that web search is inappropriate, but the specification should > provide some expectation as to what the default grammar might be. > > If you want the default grammar to be of any general use, it would need > to support common words & phrases for the current locality. It need not be > as rich as a dedicated dictation grammar or support utterances as long as > for diction tasks (though it could be). But I would expect a > 'dictation-lite'. > > -=- Jerry > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Satish S wrote: > > The vast majority of web apps using speech API wouldn't be doing web > search with the result so it would be good to not mention it in the spec. > > Cheers > Satish > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Young, Milan <Milan.Young@nuance.com>wrote: > >> I also support the idea of the engine choosing behavior when no grammars >> are present. But it would be nice to put in the spec a few examples of >> what that default might be. Dictation and web search seem like good hints. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hans Wennborg [mailto:hwennborg@google.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:27 AM >> To: Jerry Carter >> Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Default value of SpeechRecognition.grammars >> >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jerry Carter <jerry@jerrycarter.org> >> wrote: >> > Makes sense. I assume you are thinking that the default grammar should >> be fairly broad, e.g. a dictation grammar. >> >> Yes, but I don't think we should specify what the default grammar should >> be; it should be decided by the speech recognition engine. >> >> Thanks, >> Hans >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 16:14:37 UTC