- From: Young, Milan <Milan.Young@nuance.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:55:01 +0000
- To: Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com>, "olli@pettay.fi" <olli@pettay.fi>
- CC: "public-speech-api@w3.org" <public-speech-api@w3.org>
Maybe I'm missing something here, but a short is going to give us 65k possibilities. That's the maximum size of an array in many languages. If a recognition engine can't put the right answer into one of those slots it has bigger problems. -----Original Message----- From: Hans Wennborg [mailto:hwennborg@google.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 3:53 AM To: olli@pettay.fi Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org Subject: Re: The SpeechRecognition.maxNBest attribute On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: >> negative values wouldn't be allowed(?), so how about we make it an >> "unsigned short"? > > Why unsigned short? unsigned long should be ok OK, let's do unsigned long then. >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#idl-types > > Btw, always use the latest version of the spec > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ I foolishly clicked the "Latest Version" link on the spec ;) Thanks, Hans
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 14:55:30 UTC