- From: Satish S <satish@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:10:28 +0100
- To: Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com>
- Cc: olli@pettay.fi, public-speech-api@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 13:11:03 UTC
On a related note, I think it is better to name the attribute as "maxResults" or "maxAlternatives" as they convey the meaning of the attribute better than 'n-best'. Thoughts? Cheers Satish On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Hans Wennborg <hwennborg@google.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> > wrote: > >> negative values wouldn't be allowed(?), so how about we make it an > >> "unsigned short"? > > > > Why unsigned short? unsigned long should be ok > > OK, let's do unsigned long then. > > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#idl-types > > > > Btw, always use the latest version of the spec > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/ > > I foolishly clicked the "Latest Version" link on the spec ;) > > Thanks, > Hans > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 13:11:03 UTC