- From: Raj (Openstream) <raj@openstream.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:44:37 -0400
- To: "Jim Barnett" <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>, "Bjorn Bringert" <bringert@google.com>, "Satish S" <satish@google.com>
- Cc: "Young, Milan" <Milan.Young@nuance.com>, "Deborah Dahl" <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>, "Glen Shires" <gshires@google.com>, <public-speech-api@w3.org>
+1 On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:29:01 -0700 "Jim Barnett" <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com> wrote: > However, I haven't seen any progress on Milan's third priority: > > • Plan to merge our work into an official standards-track >deliverable within the next year. > > I consider this to be very important. I would also like to see a >more formal procedure for making decisions. I think that adding >Milan as a co-chair can help in both areas. > > - Jim > > -----Original Message----- >From: Bjorn Bringert [mailto:bringert@google.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 6:05 AM > To: Satish S > Cc: Young, Milan; Raj (Openstream); Deborah Dahl; Glen Shires; >public-speech-api@w3.org > Subject: Re: Co-chair > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Satish S <satish@google.com> >wrote: >>> Support for EMMA (FPR-4) was the second-most demanded feature of >>>such >>> an API, yet this group has been haggling since inception on whether >>> we need such a feature at all. It would be one thing if the >>> arguments were part of a grass roots movement across the industry, >>> but they are not. The opponents are almost unanimously aligned >>>under >>> the Google flag which holds both the chair and editor positions. >>> This doesn't feel like a community. >> >> >> Looking back at the mailing list archives, it is clear that most of >> the questions about EMMA usage were raised by me and I am neither a >> chair nor an editor. Adding more chairs to the CG isn't going to >> change this. To their credit both Glen and Hans have been trying >>find >> a common language among all the discussions. >> >> Also note that all of my proposals and questions come from my web >> developer background and such perspectives are something the group >> will get a lot when taking the API proposal to the standards track. >> >> What we clearly need is to get more web developers and UA vendors >> participate, not more chairs or editors. > > +1 > > -- > Bjorn Bringert > Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham >Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ Registered in England Number: 3977902 > -- NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION. Reply to : legal@openstream.com
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 11:50:22 UTC